tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post2570489970977175640..comments2024-03-12T23:34:49.694+00:00Comments on ersby: Pat Price’s remote viewing of URDF-3, Semipalatinsk, USSR in 1974Ersbyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-65879675461553992472021-08-29T16:43:48.652+01:002021-08-29T16:43:48.652+01:00Sorry, forgot the url for the Washington Post arti...Sorry, forgot the url for the Washington Post article<br /><br />https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mBu1aYkT_04J:https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/feed/a5067-1999oct17.htm+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ukErsbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-50593471071794124872021-08-29T16:41:07.524+01:002021-08-29T16:41:07.524+01:00I don’t know when the sketches were made or by who...I don’t know when the sketches were made or by who. I looked a little more into this hit after your comment and I was reminded that the US military knew about them as early as the 1960s. This article from the Washington Post reads: “Fears about particle beam research at P-NUTS were first aroused in the late '60s when satellite pictures showed Soviet workers assembling several steel spheres nearly 60 feet in diameter.”<br /><br />In relation to this, remember that the plan for these sessions was that Pat Price would be introduced to someone more knowledgeable about the site (Stillman notes that during the third day, Price is shown a sketch of URDF-3). Since the sketch is not from the two days when Price was somewhat blind to the target, it could be that the spheres were drawn during a discussion in which the person who knew about URDF-3 raised the subject first.<br />Ersbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-39613218544286110832021-08-28T20:22:05.401+01:002021-08-28T20:22:05.401+01:00Hi, it's quite an interesting blog post!
Do y...Hi, it's quite an interesting blog post!<br /><br />Do you believe that the phrase "segments of metallic strips" was written BEFORE or AFTER May 1977?<br />Was it written by Price or someone else?Marchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08328792937888689350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-27522341719803962682018-04-25T06:11:44.938+01:002018-04-25T06:11:44.938+01:00I'm inclined to believe the first-hand documen...I'm inclined to believe the first-hand documents. One thing I've noticed when researching Project Star Gate is that almost every single claim of success has been exaggerated, especially concerning how blind people were to the target.Ersbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-90945970927844525242018-04-24T12:18:18.268+01:002018-04-24T12:18:18.268+01:00Hello there. That's a very interesting analysi...Hello there. That's a very interesting analysis!<br /><br />"At the start of the experiment, Price was given the map co-ordinates (50°09'59"N 78°22'22"E), was shown the site’s position on a number of maps, and told that it was 60 miles WSW of Semipalatinsk and 25 to 30 SW of a river and he was told it is a scientific military research and test area."<br /><br />I am puzzled by that. Targ Russel said that they had first no clue about the nature of the site. Who is right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-43727872868404537902017-12-19T14:19:10.157+00:002017-12-19T14:19:10.157+00:00I highly recommend to your attention a book called...I highly recommend to your attention a book called "Watergate: The Hoax," by Ashton Gray. If the title seems at all off-topic, believe me, it's not; it is a staggering 600-page exposé on what the CIA was doing in the 1960s and early 1970s that led to the 1 October 1972 then-secret contract with Puthoff at SRI, who brought in Ingo Swann and Pat Price as the central core of the RV program. The work reflects the kind of in-depth research you do, which I greatly admire. Thank you for all of this excellent information and analysis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-36911320915157667072017-05-12T18:11:15.925+01:002017-05-12T18:11:15.925+01:00I'm aware of those shows but, unfortunately, m...I'm aware of those shows but, unfortunately, my grasp of the Japanese language isn't good enough to fully understand what clips I've seen online. Nor would I fully trust those kinds of semi-serious, semi-variety shows.<br /><br />But talking of Japan, I keep meaning to look into his work remote viewing the burial place of the mythical (?) Queen Himiko, though. It interests me as a subject, plus there's a lot more on this from academic sources in English. And a documentary too:<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWwUvRv0pCgErsbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-9934688904242731722017-05-11T20:45:03.561+01:002017-05-11T20:45:03.561+01:00You seem to speak Japanese well, so I was wonderin...You seem to speak Japanese well, so I was wondering if you knew anything about Joe McMoneagle's remote viewing he did for a Japanese TV show. Would you happen to know about it in detail?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-25494550049245901892017-04-02T05:52:26.100+01:002017-04-02T05:52:26.100+01:00I forgot about that one, that is a good RV session...I forgot about that one, that is a good RV session. I have tried to research Joe's remote viewing of th XM-1 tank, but I had difficulty finding detailed enough material on the tank itself to compare it to. Also, it was part of a project number 8003, which ran for most of 1980. I've been trying to find out what the purpose of that project was.Ersbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-72473983952520904022017-04-01T18:14:30.101+01:002017-04-01T18:14:30.101+01:00Thank you.
One more thing (thank you for putting ...Thank you.<br /><br />One more thing (thank you for putting up with my questions!), are you familiar with Joe McMoneagle's apparent remote viewing of the XM-1 tank? I was curious about it, but I had not been able to find much other than a positive summary, and had difficulty locating the original documents, so I wanted to see if you would know better (as you definitely seem to with many of these cases).<br /><br />I think this should be it for a while.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-9762040522354617772017-04-01T18:02:56.307+01:002017-04-01T18:02:56.307+01:00Yes, my talk covered a lot of examples I haven’t w...Yes, my talk covered a lot of examples I haven’t written about here, such as Paul Smith’s remote viewing of the Stealth Bomber and also his remote viewing of a missile attack on a US ship (perhaps the closest that the operational work got to a clear hit), Lyn Buchanan’s remote viewing of the hostage LCT Higgins, and also the early work done at SRI.<br /><br />As for Price’s viewing of the crane, I meant that the usual description of the crane hit (ie, of Price describing it almost immediately) was inaccurate. It’s true he mentioned a crane in passing during the first day, but it wasn’t until after he’d been asked for more information about it that he described the remarkable size of the crane.Ersbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-90813188207857093402017-04-01T17:35:35.248+01:002017-04-01T17:35:35.248+01:00Also (I apologize for asking in a separate post, I...Also (I apologize for asking in a separate post, I forgot to mention it in my other one), you say that Pat Price did not come up with his gantry hit on the first session, but you also say that "Midway through the first afternoon session, Price mentioned a crane and some low boy trucks", which would be before he had received the call about focusing on the gantry. I had been confused what you meant by this: are you saying that, since the gantry was mentioned in passing without being given more details about it, it is not to be considered a hit as the specifics of the gantry did not come until later?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-4529766833466176732017-04-01T17:31:38.733+01:002017-04-01T17:31:38.733+01:00Thank you for your response.
Did it concern a rem...Thank you for your response.<br /><br />Did it concern a remote viewing case that you had not discussed yet in this blog? I had been curious about which case it was.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-72897674325603019812017-04-01T17:28:28.363+01:002017-04-01T17:28:28.363+01:00Hello,
I'm afraid there's no transcript, ...Hello,<br /><br />I'm afraid there's no transcript, since I just used the powerpoint as a kind of memory aid, which prompted me to talk about certain things at particular times. As such, the ppt wouldn't make much sense on its own since it's mostly pictures and a few captions. But thanks for dropping by.Ersbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08012602968152264418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2076774095757676470.post-62914257212636264332017-04-01T05:57:31.851+01:002017-04-01T05:57:31.851+01:00Hi,
While I was reading about remote viewing, I c...Hi,<br /><br />While I was reading about remote viewing, I came across this talk that you had given about a year ago: https://bristolskeptics.com/2016/01/07/27th-april-2016-andrew-endersby-remote-viewing-10-ways-to-get-the-same-experiment-wrong/<br /><br />Might you still have what you used here to give the talk, like slides, pages, transcripts, etc? I would be interested in reading more about this. Thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com